[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux TCP impotency
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:54:15PM +0200, wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:38:53PM +0200, wrote:
> > Using 2.2.19 I discovered that running two simultaneous scp's (uses up whole
> > capacity in TCP traffic) on a 115200bps full duplex serial port nullmodem cable
> > causes the earlier started one to survive and the later to starve. Running bcp
> > instead of the second (which uses UDP) at 11000 bytes per second caused the
> > utilization in both directions to go up nearly to 100%.
> >
> > Is this a normal TCP stack behaviour?
> Might very well be. Read about different forms of (class based) queuing
> which try (and succeed) to improve IP in this respect. TCP is not fair and
> IP has no intrinsic features to help you. contains
> some explanations and links.
> SFQ sounds like it might fit your bill.
> Regards,
> bert
> --
> Versatile DNS Services
> Trilab The Technology People
> 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
> -

I was about to report the same 'od' behaviour : I have 3
machines, connected via a HUB at 100 Mb/s half duplex.

From machine A : rsh B dd if=/dev/zero bs=8192 | dd of=/dev/null

=> transfert around 10/11 MB/s (B => A)

Now, I start a second transfert from machine C :

rsh B dd if=/dev/zero bs=8192 | dd of=/dev/null

=> transfert around 10/11 MB/s between B and C, almost nothing
between A and B (ie, the connexion is stalled between A and B).

If I stop the second transfert, I takes many seconds for
the transfert to restart between A and B.

On a highly saturated network, I have already seen such a

Is that related to the IP adresses, the lowest being served
first ?

Thierry Danis
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.027 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site