[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants
> > (c) does not require devfs.  most distros ship without it afaik, and
> > switching to it is not an overnight process, and requires devfsd to be
> > useful in the real world.
> >
> It does, however, not manage permissions, nor does it provide for a sane
> namespace (it exposes too many internal implementation details in the
> interface -- in particular, the driver becomes part of the namespace, and
> devices move around between drivers regularly.)

It is also very hard to tar that device file.

As to devfsd well Al Viro was reporting races in it long ago that I don't
believe Richard has had time to fix nor has anyone else fixed.

What is the state on devfs there ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.245 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site