[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: LVM 1.0 release decision
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:36:11PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> IMHO, no 64-bit architecture code should provide translation functions for
> ioctls from 32-bit binaries.
> This is now a sufficiently common requirement that it shouldn't be repeated
> by all architectures that require it - it should be somewhere common.
> Like linux/abi/ioctl32/

Better linux/abi/linux32 and have other 32/64-bit stuff there too.
At least the binfmt_elf32 stuff should be made MI, IMHO.


Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.307 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site