lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectMystery speed: Was Re: 3c590 vs. tulip
Date
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.


I'll do some more concrete testing this weekend. Don't get me wrong, if
computers can do what I want before even I know it, I'm happy :-)

Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
To: "Dan Mann" <daniel_b_mann@hotmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip


>
> > faster machine it is much slower. Images take at least .5 to 1 second
to
> > load when they are stored locally. But over the network, with 2.4.4 and
> > samba 2.2, It's as if the server "knows" what I'm going to ask for
before I
> > actually do. Is this normal? I honestly don't think it was this fast
when
> > server was on 2.2 Kernel with samba 2.07.
>
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.
>
> -Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.055 / U:1.176 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site