[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectMystery speed: Was Re: 3c590 vs. tulip
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.

I'll do some more concrete testing this weekend. Don't get me wrong, if
computers can do what I want before even I know it, I'm happy :-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Kleen" <>
To: "Dan Mann" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip

> > faster machine it is much slower. Images take at least .5 to 1 second
> > load when they are stored locally. But over the network, with 2.4.4 and
> > samba 2.2, It's as if the server "knows" what I'm going to ask for
before I
> > actually do. Is this normal? I honestly don't think it was this fast
> > server was on 2.2 Kernel with samba 2.07.
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.
> -Andi

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.052 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site