Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Dan Mann" <> | Subject | Mystery speed: Was Re: 3c590 vs. tulip | Date | Fri, 11 May 2001 10:49:23 -0400 |
| |
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.
I'll do some more concrete testing this weekend. Don't get me wrong, if computers can do what I want before even I know it, I'm happy :-)
Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de> To: "Dan Mann" <daniel_b_mann@hotmail.com> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip
> > > faster machine it is much slower. Images take at least .5 to 1 second to > > load when they are stored locally. But over the network, with 2.4.4 and > > samba 2.2, It's as if the server "knows" what I'm going to ask for before I > > actually do. Is this normal? I honestly don't think it was this fast when > > server was on 2.2 Kernel with samba 2.07. > > Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it. > > -Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |