[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Wow! Is memory ever cheap!
Followup to:  <>
By author: Edgar Toernig <>
In newsgroup:
> I think you have a wrong idea why the ECC is there. ECC deals with
> the inherit shortcommings of DRAM.
> DRAMs are not perfect. They have a probability to lose a bit.
> Normally this probability is low enough to live with it. Lets say
> you have a system with 1MByte and let's say the probability for a
> single bit error is around 1 error in 100 years. Good enough.
> Now put 1GByte in the system. You'll get a probability of 10 errors
> per year. Maybe good enough for a Windows box but not acceptable
> for your server. So you put in ECC to bring this probability back
> into reasonable numbers. ECC can correct the single bit errors.
> You only have to deal with double bit errors. Chance for them is
> much much lower.

Yes, ECC, unlike parity, is a technique for reducing the error rate,
with the side benefit of intercepting an error when it happens.

I am not disagreeing with Larry that integrity checks are a Good
Thing[TM], and in general are a hallmark of good engineering.
However, they are not a replacement for ECC for the purpose of driving
the failure rate down into an acceptable probability range.

It is of course a very nice thing that DRAM prices have come down into
the range where buying them in gigabyte quantities are reasonable :)

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.099 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site