[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles

On Thu, 10 May 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > No. __GFP_FAIL can to try to reclaim pages from inactive clean.
> >
> > We just want to avoid __GFP_FAIL allocations from going to
> > try_to_free_pages().
> Why? __GFP_FAIL is only useful as an indication that the caller has
> some magic mechanism for coping with failure.

Hum, not _only_.

Initially I thought about __GFP_FAIL to be used by writeout routines which
want to cluster pages until they can allocate memory without causing any
pressure to the system. Something like this:

while ((page = alloc_page(GFP_FAIL))



> There's no other information passed, so a brief call to
> try_to_free_pages is quite appropriate.

This obviously depends on what we decide __GFP_FAIL will be used for.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.039 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site