[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3
On 05/10, Matthias Andree rearranged the electrons to read:
> On Wed, 09 May 2001, Mart?n Marqu?s wrote:
> > There has also been lots of talks about reiserfs being the cause of
> > some data lose and performance lose (not sure about this last one).
> I never experienced ReiserFS data loss, but I did experience read
> performance loss over ext2fs and switched that file system back to ext2.
> The ReiserFS people could not reproduce the problem, so I'm not sure
> what was the actual cause.
> ext3fs has never given me any problems, but I did not have it in
> production use where I discovered major ReiserFS <-> kNFSd
> incompatibilities. ext3 has a 0.0.x version number which suggests it's
> not meant for production use.
> XFS is claimed to work with NFS, but not currently availabe for Linux
> 2.4.4.

$ uname -r
$ uptime
9:20am up 1 day, 18:28, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

Hob Goblin

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose
both and deserve neither. - Thomas Jefferson
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:1.259 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site