[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench
Bruce Allan wrote:
> Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> > to post the test data.
> The Netfinity system that you are using has two different supported GigE
> adapters. I assume you are using one of these types - Netfinity Gigabit
> Ethernet Adapter (19K4401) and the Netfinity Gigabit Ethernet SX Server
> Adapter (06P3701); using the acenic.c and e1000.c drivers, respectively.
> >From what I understand after initial perusal of the two drivers, the former
> has receive checksumming support on the adapter itself while the latter,
> the one you are using, does not support hardware checksumming (at least, it
> is not enabled by the driver).


According to Intel's driver for Pro/1000, it supports checksum on Rx via
module option "XsunRX=1". I have not tried this yet because we are
waiting on our Gbps switch hardware.
> Are you able to re-run your tests with GigE adapters that support
> checksumming on the hardware instead of doing it in the kernel? If not, I
> will be running similar tests in a very similar configuration (with the
> 19K4401 adapters) in the near future and can share results if you'd like.

Yes, hopefully we will be running the new setup (64 clients, many Gbps
adapters) in about 2-3 weeks. At that point I'd like to get some
results for 8-way as well. It would definitely be a good idea to
compare results.

Andrew Theurer
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.066 / U:1.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site