Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: No 100 HZ timer ! | | Date | Mon, 09 Apr 2001 13:30:34 -0500 | | From | Jeff Dike <> |
| |
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com said: > I have a suggestion that might seem unusual at first but it is > important for Linux on S/390. We are facing the problem that we want > to start many (> 1000) Linux images on a big S/390 machine. Every > image has its own 100 HZ timer on every processor the images uses > (normally 1). On a single image system the processor use of the 100 HZ > timer is not a big deal but with > 1000 images you need a lot of > processing power just to execute the 100 HZ timers. You quickly end up > with 100% CPU only for the timer interrupts of otherwise idle images.
This is going to be a problem for UML as well, and I was considering something very similar. I did a quick scan of your prose, and the description sounds like what I had in mind.
So, count me in as a supporter of this.
A small request: Since S/390 is not the only port that needs this, I'd be happy if it was made as generic as possible (and it may already be, I haven't gone through the code yet).
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |