Tim Waugh wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:23:27PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > You asked in your last message to show you code, here is a short
> > example.  Note that I would love to rip out the SUPERIO code in parport
> > and make it a separate driver like this short, contrived example.  Much
> > more modular than the existing solution.
> 
> (The superio code is on its way out anyway, for different reasons..)

I think there will be further discussion on this :)

> More modular?  Yes, it adds another module to support a card, so yes
> there are more modules.
> 
> But with the multifunction_quirks approach, support is a question of
> adding two lines in a table.

struct pci_driver is going to become struct driver, don't forget.  With
that in mind, the "multifunction_quirks" patch appears even more of a
bus-specific hack.

Why do you want to dirty the soon-to-be generic driver API for stupid
hardware?

It takes two seconds to write a shim driver as I have described, and
further a shim driver is not necessary on sensible hardware.

	Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik       | Sam: "Mind if I drive?"
Building 1024     | Max: "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash
MandrakeSoft      |       and shrieking like a cheerleader."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/