Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Miller, Brendan" <> | | Subject | Proper way to release binary-only driver? | | Date | Thu, 5 Apr 2001 06:58:34 -0400 |
| |
I have the need to distribute a binary-only driver (no flames, please), but I am not certain how to build it so that it can be used on multiple kernel versions. (Or is this impossible?)
I didn't find any "HOWTO (or recommendation) for proper binary-only driver release etiquette", so if there are some preferred means, please let me know.
I specifically had issues with the whole MODVERSIONS thing. I can include <linux/verion.h> and <linux/config.h> to get the right CONFIG_MODVERSIONS macro definitions, and then include <linux/modversions.h> as appropriate. The end result is a driver with symbols whose names are mangled to match the modversion-enabled mangling of a modversion-enabled kernel. This is good if I release on the same kernel version.
Obviously, if I use a different kernel the module refuses to load. My first guess was to get rid of the module-versioning stuff so that the symbols are not mangled, and this seems to work, except that I must use insmod -f module for kernels with a different version than what I built with.
So, if there are guides that I didn't find, or ones on this list that someone things I should use, please let me know. Or at least comment on my chosen way of doing things. It's this sort of thing that reinforces a source form driver is the way to release stuff--then it can be built alongside the user's kernel tree...
Please cc: me as I am not subscribed.
Brendan Miller Dialogic, An Intel Company
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |