Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:55:44 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better scheduler |
| |
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:44:22AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > Let me stress that HP scheduler is not meant to be a replacement for the > current scheduler. The HP scheduler patch allows the current scheduler > to be replaced by another scheduler by loading a module in special > cases.
HP also has a simple mq patch that is _not_ integrated into the pluggable scheduler framework, I have used it myself.
Christoph
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |