lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Larger dev_t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Device numbers/names have to be constant in order to detect
> disk layout changes across boots.

Names stay constant, but why the NUMBERS? The names should stay
constant and represent the actual layout on each busses (say:
sane hierachic enumeration) of course.

But /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 could get a new device
number on every reboot, right?

I'm sure, I'm missing some important usage of device of device
numers here (not counting the ones listed already), but I don't
know what ;-)

Otherwise it would be too easy to remove static major/minors and
all the fun allocating them. And LANANA would have one thing less
to worry about ;-)

One thing I certainly miss: DevFS is not mandatory (yet).

Thanks & Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.077 / U:3.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site