lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Larger dev_t
Date
From
> > One thing I certainly miss: DevFS is not mandatory (yet).
>
> That's "only" due to the fact that DevFS is an insanely racy and
> instable
> piece of CRAP. I'm unhappy it's there anyway...

It certainly seems to have some race conditions but other than that and the
slight problem it puts policy in the kernel it seems ok. I'd prefer it was
userspace and implemented via /sbin/hotplug - but that isnt possible yet and
opens a whole other set of interesting races to ponder

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.063 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site