[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: question regarding cpu selection
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:13:12PM +0200, you [Erik Mouw] claimed:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:32:51PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:28:48PM -0400, you [Duncan Gauld] claimed:
> > > I would supply a patch, but I don't know how to write such a thing :)
> >
> > It seems Erik Mouw already submitted a patch, altough I agree that "Celeron
> > II" might be a better name for the thing than "Celeron (Coppermine)".
> So what about this one? This time I had to change and
> setup.c as well to reflect the changes in :)

Hmm. I just checked Intel's web site (should've done so earlier), and it
appears that Intel still dubs the new revision as "Celeron", although I'm
sure it was introduced as CeleronII in some sources (try So I'll just have admit that your
first patch was technically correct, and I was wrong. Sorry for the

I still think "Celeron II" is clearer, but heaven knows what Intel will sell
by that name three years from now (just think of i860).

-- v --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.062 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site