[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectZerocopy implementation issues

Can someone please explain to me the rationale behind the zerocopy
implementation that has appeared in 2.4.4 please?

The reason I ask is that even on x86, it seems to me to be extremely
silly to have the expense of doing unaligned checksumming for the gain
of zerocopy.

Just think - if you did checksumming on aligned word boundaries you
could be far faster!

(Yes, you guessed it, its broken on ARM, and is going to make the
networking layer pig slow if we keep the current implementation as
it stands due to the phenominal amount of exceptions it _will_
generate - 1 exception per word in a packet).

I'm still investigating the source of the networking corruptions I'm
seeing, but its looking like the above is the reason (data is being
corrupted on TCP send).

Russell King ( The developer of ARM Linux

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.063 / U:7.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site