Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:11:25 -0400 (EDT) | From | John Cavan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Single user linux |
| |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 imel96@trustix.co.id wrote: > you're right, we could do it in more than one way. like copying > with mcopy without mounting a fat disk. the question is where to put it. > why we do it is an important thing. > taking place as a clueless user, i think i should be able to do anything. > i'd be happy to accept proof that multi-user is a solution for > clueless user, not because it's proven on servers. but because it is > a solution by definition. >
I think you have it backwards here, given that Linux works one way and you want it to work another. Basically, I would suggest that it is up to you to prove that multi-user is NOT a solution for "clueless" user, especially given that there have been a number of suggestions on how to do it without changing the kernel or even changing software.
If you can't prove the case, I rather suspect that your patch won't make it. Don't feel bad though, I've yet to get one through either. :o)
John
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |