[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /proc format (was Device Registry (DevReg) Patch 0.2.0)

On 04.25 Jesse Pollard wrote:
> Alternatively, you can always put one value per record:
> tag:value
> tag2:value2...
> This is still simpler than XML to read, and to generate.

Just my two cents.

It looks clear that /proc is for programs, not for humans. So the best format
for proc is just binary values. So programs can read it quickly, even in
a chunk if they know the format. But sometimes it is usefull to do a cat on
a /proc entry.

Question: it is possible to redirect the same fs call (say read) to different
implementations, based on the open mode of the file descriptor ? So, if
you open the entry in binary, you just get the number chunk, if you open
it in ascii you get a pretty printed version, or a format description like
Bus: %d
Device: %h
to 'vprintf' the values.

J.A. Magallon # Let the source # be with you, Luke...

Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac14 #1 SMP Wed Apr 25 02:07:45 CEST 2001 i686

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.050 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site