lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: /proc/config idea
Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Yes, I like this. I do this manually, it allows reproducability, and
> incremental
> modifications, tracing how that kernel on that problem system was made...
>
> I think the ultimate would be to put all of .config (gzipped?) in a new ELF
> section without the Loadable attribute... I wish System.map was the same.
> The you're guaranteed you know how a kernel on disk was configured.
>
> To correlate a running kernel to one on disk (vmlinuz) you have LILO...
> it appends an environment variable to the kernel command line with
> the name of the file it booted. This is not infallable, since LILO maps
> disk sectors, only using the filesystem at map install time.
>
> Permaps an md5sum of the .text ELF section would conclusively
> link the in-core kernel with an on-disk vmlinuz? Shouldn't be hard
> to do with objcopy and /proc/kmem?
[...]
> Comments anyone?

Instead of doing all this stuff in the kernel, you could simply update
symlinks to properly installed files at boot time.

Putting _files_ in the kernel is plain silly. This is unreclaimable
memory, folks. There is no need to special case an operation as simple
as reading a file. [I think this about firmware images too, but that's
another thread]

--
Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
Building 1024 | a full moon on a dark night,
MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.124 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site