[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Process pinning
    Tim Hockin wrote:
    > > disallowed CPU on which it is already running. And even a non-RT
    > > process will stick on its disallowed CPU as long as nothing else runs
    > > there.
    > are we going to keep the cpus_allowed API? If we want the (IMHO) more
    > flexible sysmp() API - I'll finish the 2.4 port. If we are going to keep
    > cpus_allowed - I'll just abandon pset and sysmp.
    > Personally, I like sysmp() and the pset tools better, perhaps with a /proc
    > extension to it.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.019 / U:1.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site