[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Process pinning
Tim Hockin wrote:
> > disallowed CPU on which it is already running. And even a non-RT
> > process will stick on its disallowed CPU as long as nothing else runs
> > there.
> are we going to keep the cpus_allowed API? If we want the (IMHO) more
> flexible sysmp() API - I'll finish the 2.4 port. If we are going to keep
> cpus_allowed - I'll just abandon pset and sysmp.
> Personally, I like sysmp() and the pset tools better, perhaps with a /proc
> extension to it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.064 / U:1.600 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site