lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Process pinning
    Tim Hockin wrote:
    >
    > > disallowed CPU on which it is already running. And even a non-RT
    > > process will stick on its disallowed CPU as long as nothing else runs
    > > there.
    >
    > are we going to keep the cpus_allowed API? If we want the (IMHO) more
    > flexible sysmp() API - I'll finish the 2.4 port. If we are going to keep
    > cpus_allowed - I'll just abandon pset and sysmp.
    >
    > Personally, I like sysmp() and the pset tools better, perhaps with a /proc
    > extension to it.

    http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/cpus_allowed.patch
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.020 / U:29.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site