lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: scheduler went mad?
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:

> You mean without dropping out_of_memory() test in kswapd and calling
> oom_kill() in page fault [i.e. without additional patch]?

No. I think it's ok for __alloc_pages() to call oom_kill()
IF we turn out to be out of memory, but that should not even
be needed.

Also, when a task in __alloc_pages() is OOM-killed, it will
have PF_MEMALLOC set and will immediately break out of the
loop. The rest of the system will spin around in the loop
until the victim has exited and then their allocations will
succeed.

regards,

Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.067 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site