[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: scheduler went mad?
    On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > 2.4.3-pre6 quietly made a very significant change there:
    > > it used to say "if (!order) goto try_again;" and now just
    > > says "goto try_again;". Which seems very sensible since
    > > __GFP_WAIT is set, but I do wonder if it was a safe change.
    > > We have mechanisms for freeing pages (order 0), but whether
    > > any higher orders come out of that is a matter of chance.
    > The fundamental problem is that it should say
    > wait_for_mm_progress();
    > goto try_again;
    > and we dont have that facility right now.

    From mm/page_alloc.c, around line 453:

    if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
    goto try_again;

    I guess we should remove the wakeup_bdflush(0) ... who put it
    there anyway ?


    Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
    However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.021 / U:21.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site