[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: No 100 HZ timer !
> Does not sound very attractive all at all on non virtual machines (I see the point on
> UML/VM):
> making system entry/context switch/interrupts slower, making add_timer slower, just to
> process a few less timer interrupts. That's like robbing the fast paths for a slow path.

Measure the number of clocks executing a timer interrupt. rdtsc is fast. Now
consider the fact that out of this you get KHz or better scheduling
resolution required for games and midi. I'd say it looks good. I agree
the accounting of user/system time needs care to avoid slowing down syscall


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.098 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site