[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: No 100 HZ timer !

> Just how would you do kernel/user CPU time accounting then ? It's currently done
> on every timer tick, and doing it less often would make it useless.

Except for machines with very slow timers we really should account time
to processes during context switch instead of sampling on timer ticks.
The current values are in many situations (i.e., lots of processes
or a process frequently waiting for events bound to timer) a pile
of random numbers.

Have a nice fortnight
Martin `MJ' Mares <> <>
We all live in a yellow subroutine...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.138 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site