lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?
    On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > > > Of course. Now we just need the code to determine when a task
    > > > > is holding some kernel-side lock ;)
    > > >
    > > > couldn't it just be indicated on actual locking the resource?
    > >
    > > It could, but I doubt we would want this overhead on the locking...
    >
    > Just raise the priority whenever the task's in kernel mode. Problem solved.

    Remember that a task schedules itself out at the timer interrupt,
    in kernel/sched.c::schedule() ... which is kernel mode ;)

    Rik
    --
    Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

    Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
    However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

    http://www.surriel.com/
    http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.022 / U:0.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site