Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:48:39 -0700 (MST) | From | james rich <> | Subject | Re: Questions about Enterprise Storage with Linux |
| |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> james rich <james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu>: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote: > > > > > 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about > > > large files over NFS? > > > > > > 3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use > > > reirserfs on our internal system, but they generally have filesystems in the > > > 18-30GB ranges and we're talking about potentially 10-20x that. Should we > > > look at JFS/XFS or others? > > > > I think that for filesystems this size you definately want to look at XFS > > of JFS. Maybe you will decide not to use them - but you should test them. > > > > I am currently using XFS and it really works. It currently has some > > issues when used with raid 1, but it is probably the most suited for what > > you want. Exporting an XFS volume over NFS is no problem. You can also > > use xfs_growfs to change the size of your XFS partition. I haven't had > > any instability during all the time I've used XFS. > > The biggest difficulty I had with XFS (not on linux as a server) had > more to do with NFS/XFS performance. The SGI clients worked fine while > the Linux clients were about 10-20% slower. This was a year ago so this > may not apply anymore. I haven't seen any Linux NFS benchmarks recently.
Recent changes in CVS appear to have resolved this issue.
James Rich james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |