Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:09:43 +0800 | From | linuxjob <> | Subject | Re[2]: What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD? |
| |
Hello Gregory,
Friday, March 02, 2001, 9:00:07 PM, you wrote:
GM> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 09:02:13AM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: >> reiser@namesys.com (Hans Reiser) writes: >> > If I can't get information about BSD v. Linux 2.4 networking code, >> > then reiserfs has to get ported to BSD which will be both nice and a >> > pain to do. >> >> So we would get dual-licensed ReiserFS (BSD and GPL)? >> >> Are you aware of the legal implications, making your currently >> GPL-only code BSD-licensed (status of third party patches for the GPL >> code and so on)?
GM> There would be no reason to BSD licence ReiserFS.. The intent of the BSD GM> licence is to let anyone who wants to lock it up with more restrictive GM> licences do so, and if the result is more popular.. take over control of the GM> software.
GM> So Hans could easily release a GPLed copy of FreeBSD with reiserfs. This GM> type of activity is encouraged by the BSD people. GM> - GM> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in GM> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org GM> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html GM> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Yes, I have never heard a version -- FreeLinux. Linux is not free. FreeBSD is true free.
Regards, linuxjob mailto:linuxjob@163.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |