Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:10:08 +0100 | From | Sean Hunter <> | Subject | Re: Disturbing news.. |
| |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:08:15AM -0600, Jesse Pollard wrote: > Sure - very simple. If the execute bit is set on a file, don't allow > ANY write to the file. This does modify the permission bits slightly > but I don't think it is an unreasonable thing to have. >
Are we not then in the somewhat zen-like state of having an "rm" which can't "rm" itself without needing to be made non-executable so that it can't execute?
Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |