Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:53:05 -0500 (EST) | From | Ivan Passos <> | Subject | Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces |
| |
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ivan Passos wrote: > > Maybe it's a better idea to have just two ioctl's here (GET and SET), and > > have "subioctl's" inside the structure passed to the HDLC layer (and > > defined by the HDLC layer). This would allow changes in the HDLC layer > > without having to change sockios.h (you'd still have to change HDLC's > > code and definitions, but this would be more self-contained). Again, this > > may be better, or maybe not. What do you think? > > That's essentially what's happening with ethtool > (include/linux/ethtool.h in 2.4.3-pre8)
Then maybe it's really a better idea, after all. ;)
Krzysztof, please let us know what you think.
Regards, Ivan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |