lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: regression testing
    Date
    From
    Jonathan Morton <chromi@cyberspace.org> said:
    > >- automated heavy stress testing

    > This would be an interesting one to me, from a benchmarking POV. I'd like
    > to know what my hardware can really do, for one thing - it's all very well
    > saying this box can do X Whetstones and has a 100Mbit NIC, but it's a much
    > more solid thing to be able to say "my box handled the official Foobar
    > stress-test in Y hours, handling Z widgets per second".

    Which would tell you exactly that, nothing more and nothing less. No idea
    how many users it would support reading mail via IMAP, if playing Quake on
    it is doable, or whether it is a good idea to use it as a firewall or
    development machine. Computer systems are very complex, their uses much
    more so (and extremely varied to boot); to believe some number (or even a
    small set of numbers) will tell you everything there is to know about a
    particular box is just an illusion. And a box rarely stands in isolation.
    --
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
    Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.042 / U:188.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site