lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Is there a non-written standard for coding that asm's ?
> For example:
> " adcl 12(%1), %0\n"
> "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n"
> " lea 4(%1), %1\n"
>
> or
>
> "adcl 12(%1), %0\n\t"
^[1]
> "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n\t"
> "lea 4(%1), %1\n\t"

The first one is better readable and the latter one is more
portable (since the first may contain tabs in the string, instead
of spaces and no one sees this).

You'll see, what I mean with readable, if you omit the tab in [1].


Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.092 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site