Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:56:12 +0100 | From | Ingo Oeser <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings |
| |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > Is there a non-written standard for coding that asm's ? > For example: > " adcl 12(%1), %0\n" > "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n" > " lea 4(%1), %1\n" > > or > > "adcl 12(%1), %0\n\t" ^[1] > "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n\t" > "lea 4(%1), %1\n\t"
The first one is better readable and the latter one is more portable (since the first may contain tabs in the string, instead of spaces and no one sees this).
You'll see, what I mean with readable, if you omit the tab in [1].
Regards
Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag> <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |