Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:21:00 -0500 | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.2 fs/inode.c |
| |
On Thursday, March 22, 2001 07:04:52 PM +0000 "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Jan Harkes wrote: >> >> I found some code that seems wrong and didn't even match it's comment. >> Patch is against 2.4.2, but should go cleanly against 2.4.3-pre6 as well. > > Patch looks fine to me. Have you tested it? If this goes wrong, > things break badly...
This should only affect reiserfs, and it should be a good thing. I'll do some tests, thanks for spotting.
> >> /* Don't do this for I_DIRTY_PAGES - that doesn't actually dirty the >> inode itself */ - if (flags & (I_DIRTY | I_DIRTY_SYNC)) { >> + if (flags & (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |