[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
    "David S. Miller" wrote:
    > Keith Owens writes:
    > > Or have I missed something?
    > Nope, it is a fundamental problem with such kernel pre-emption
    > schemes. As a result, it would also break our big-reader locks
    > (see include/linux/brlock.h).
    > Basically, anything which uses smp_processor_id() would need to
    > be holding some lock so as to not get pre-empted.

    It's a problem for uniprocessors as well.


    #define current_cpu_data boot_cpu_data
    #define pgd_quicklist (current_cpu_data.pgd_quick)

    extern __inline__ void free_pgd_fast(pgd_t *pgd)
    *(unsigned long *)pgd = (unsigned long) pgd_quicklist;
    pgd_quicklist = (unsigned long *) pgd;

    Preemption could corrupt this list.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.023 / U:59.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site