[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: tmpfs swapoff oddity
Hi Mike,

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> While testing Jens' loop-4 patch (and not being able to find
> any way to lock it up), I stumbled onto a strange behavior.
> I set up an interleaved swap with one swap partition, and one
> swapfile in a loopback mounted reiserfs - populated tmpfs with
> a kernel tree and did hefty make -j kernel builds to generate
> much I/O. Afterward (bored), I figured I'd bounce the data in
> tmpfs back and forth between swap containers with swapoff. It
> took much longer than I expected.

Oh, the swapoff handling in Linux is much less then suboptimal. So I
would expect that.

To explain: For every single page on swap we scan all processes vmas
and all shm/tmpfs objects swap tables :-( And we have to hold some
locks for that...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.030 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site