lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: DNS goofups galore...
Date
Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com> wrote:
> But, wait a minute. CNAME -> CNAME is a "must not".

Cite the RFC please. 1034 says
# Domain names in RRs which point at another name should always point at
# the primary name and not the alias.
and
# domain software should not fail when presented with CNAME
# chains or loops; CNAME chains should be followed and CNAME loops
# signalled as an error.
and
# - The answer to the query, possibly preface by one or more CNAME
# RRs that specify aliases encountered on the way to an answer.
and
# Multiple levels of
# aliases should be avoided due to their lack of efficiency, but should
# not be signalled as an error.

It's fairly clear that CNAMEs to CNAMEs are discouraged, but legal.

--
Aaron Denney
-><-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.043 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site