lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Small kernel-hacking.tmpl update
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> + <para>
> + For more complicated module unload locking requirements, you can set the
> + <structfield>can_unload</structfield> function pointer to your own routine,
> + which should return <returnvalue>0</returnvalue> if the module is
> + unloadable, or <returnvalue>-EBUSY</returnvalue> otherwise.
s/is unloadable/cannot be removed/

This makes it more explicit. You could read "is unloadable" as
"is not loadable", if you are not that familiar with English.

Rest ist correct AFAICS.

Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.045 / U:4.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site