Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) | Date | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:55:16 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> administrator that has worked in large multi hundred million dollar compani= > es where 1 hour of downtime =3D=3D $75,000 in lost income proactive prevent= > ion IS the right answer. If the gcc people need to compile with the .96 rh = > version then they can apply a removal patch hans provides in the crash mess= > age. This makes it easy to remove the safeguard and blow yourself up at wil= > l after being suitibly called a dumbass.
With all due respect, if you are running $75,000/hr of lost income (which btw is small fry to a lot of folks) shouldn't you have an engineering team who a) read the documentation. b) run tests before rolling out software
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |