[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch?] RAMFS
Mike Galbraith <> writes:

> However, tmpfs appears to cover the functionality provided by ramfs.
> Are there any uses for ramfs which can't be handled by tmpfs?

Nothing I know of.

> The only thing I could think of was "what if you don't have a
> swap device up and running". Seems it doesn't need one :))

Yes and no. tmpfs has a little bit overhead for the noswap case but
this overhead is in the kernel anyways for shared anon mappings. The
whole vm is using swap unconditionally.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.999 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site