lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1

On 02.03 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Christoph Rohland wrote:
> >
> > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> writes:
> >
> > > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?
> > > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...
> >
> > Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there
> > are not a lot of program out there using it.
> >
>
> Do you need it for POSIX shm or not... if so, I would say you do need it
> (even if it's going to take some time until POSIX shm becomes widely
> used.)
>

There was a post recently (that now I can't find), that said the shm
management was done with an interal fs. Was that Posix or sysv shm ?

--
J.A. Magallon $> cd pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.1-ac2 #1 SMP Sat Feb 3 10:45:59 CET 2001 i686

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans