Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:46:14 +0100 | From | "J . A . Magallon" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 |
| |
On 02.03 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Christoph Rohland wrote: > > > > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> writes: > > > > > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ? > > > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching... > > > > Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there > > are not a lot of program out there using it. > > > > Do you need it for POSIX shm or not... if so, I would say you do need it > (even if it's going to take some time until POSIX shm becomes widely > used.) >
There was a post recently (that now I can't find), that said the shm management was done with an interal fs. Was that Posix or sysv shm ?
-- J.A. Magallon $> cd pub mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer
Linux werewolf 2.4.1-ac2 #1 SMP Sat Feb 3 10:45:59 CET 2001 i686
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |