Messages in this thread | | | From | Keith Owens <> | Subject | Re: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels | Date | Sat, 03 Feb 2001 22:38:19 +1100 |
| |
On 03 Feb 2001 10:09:39 +0000, Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> wrote: >Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes: >> This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html > >I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when >building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc >headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built.
That way everybody builds a different glibc. Does that strike you as a good idea? glibc should be shipped with standard include files.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |