lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels
Date
On 03 Feb 2001 10:09:39 +0000, 
Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:
>> This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html
>
>I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when
>building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc
>headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built.

That way everybody builds a different glibc. Does that strike you as a
good idea? glibc should be shipped with standard include files.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.057 / U:2.472 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site