lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels
From
Date
Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:

> This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html

I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when
building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc
headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built. So,
irrespective of what the glibc maintainers do, would it be advisable
for the user to remove the symlinks and copy the directories from the
kernel tree and into /usr/include?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.042 / U:1.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site