[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: vmalloc improvements
In article <>,
Reto Baettig <> wrote:
>We would volounteer to improve vmalloc if there is any chance of
>getting it into the main kernel tree. We also have an idea how we
>Could do that (quite similar to the process address space management):
>1. Create a generic avl-tree headerfile (similar to list.h)

No thanks.

Just use the process address space management as-is, and make the
vmalloc address list be the same as any other address list: it would just
be the "native" address list for "init_mm".

You could probably even use "insert_vm_struct()" directly, and have that
do the AVL tree stuff for you, no changes needed.

>Is this something that makes sense to do and that could make it
>into the 2.4 or the 2.5 kernel?

It's definitely not a 2.4.x thing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.039 / U:0.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site