[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

> To have O(1) you've to have the number of hash entries > number of files and a
> really good hasing function.

No, if you enlarge the hash table twice (and re-hash everything) every time the
table fills up, the load factor of the table keeps small and everything is O(1)
amortized, of course if you have a good hashing function. If you are really
smart and re-hash incrementally, you can get O(1) worst case complexity, but
the multiplicative constant is large.

> To be sincere, here is pretty daylight :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.099 / U:2.924 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site