lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2
Hello!

> Not true. The rehashing is O(n) and it has to be performed O(log n)
> times during insertion. Therefore, insertion is O(log n).

Rehashing is O(n), but the "n" is the _current_ number of items, not the
maximum one after all the insertions.

Let's assume you start with a single-entry hash table. You rehash for the
first time after inserting the first item (giving hash table of size 2),
then after the second item (=> size 4), then after the fourth item (=> size 8)
and so on. I.e., when you insert n items, the total cost of rehashing summed
over all the insertions is at most 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + ... + 2^k (where
k=floor(log2(n))) <= 2^k+1 = O(n). That is O(1) operations per item inserted.

Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
MIPS: Meaningless Indicator of Processor Speed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans