lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: unresloved symbols in 2.4.1
JG> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote:
JG> > Eugene Danilchenko (eugene@kriljon.ru) said:
JG> > > cd /lib/modules/2.4.1; \
JG> > > mkdir -p pcmcia; \
JG> > > find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{} pcmcia
JG> > > if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.1; fi
JG> > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/fs/binfmt_elf.o
JG> > > depmod: get_pte_slow
JG> > > depmod: __handle_bad_pmd
JG> > >
JG> > > System: RedHat 6.2
JG> > > on system installed:
JG> > > modutils-2.4.2-1
JG> > >
JG> > > What does it mean.
JG> >
JG> > It means that compiling ELF binary support as a module doesn't work right.
JG> >
JG> > > and what have i to do to avoid it?
JG> >
JG> > Compile it in (CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y). If you're using Red Hat Linux 6.2,
JG> > compiling it as a module is an incredibly bad idea anyway.
JG>
JG> I wonder if we shouldn't disable CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=m, until we have a
JG> good use case and some good testers.
I think that if this module cant install this way, making as module must be disabled

Eugene
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans