Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:12:39 +0000 | From | Eugene Danilchenko <> | Subject | Re: unresloved symbols in 2.4.1 |
| |
JG> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote: JG> > Eugene Danilchenko (eugene@kriljon.ru) said: JG> > > cd /lib/modules/2.4.1; \ JG> > > mkdir -p pcmcia; \ JG> > > find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{} pcmcia JG> > > if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.1; fi JG> > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/fs/binfmt_elf.o JG> > > depmod: get_pte_slow JG> > > depmod: __handle_bad_pmd JG> > > JG> > > System: RedHat 6.2 JG> > > on system installed: JG> > > modutils-2.4.2-1 JG> > > JG> > > What does it mean. JG> > JG> > It means that compiling ELF binary support as a module doesn't work right. JG> > JG> > > and what have i to do to avoid it? JG> > JG> > Compile it in (CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y). If you're using Red Hat Linux 6.2, JG> > compiling it as a module is an incredibly bad idea anyway. JG> JG> I wonder if we shouldn't disable CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=m, until we have a JG> good use case and some good testers.
I think that if this module cant install this way, making as module must be disabled
Eugene - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |