[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:40:03AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Please, do not do so. That depends on the PACKAGE name and version, and there
> is no standard way of versioning a patched gcc.
> The -54 is a RH'ism, for example Mandrake Cooker includes patches from
> different sources, and gcc is versioned like

You can do:
if [ "$CC" = gcc ]; then
echo 'inline void f(unsigned int n){int i,j=-1;for(i=0;i<10&&j<0;i++)if((1UL<<i)==n)j=i;if(j<0)exit(0);}main(){f(64);exit(1);}' > test.c
gcc -O2 -o test test.c
if ./test; then echo "*** Please don't use this compiler to compile kernel"; fi
rm -f test.c test

(the $CC = gcc test is there e.g. so that the test is not done when
cross-compiling or when there is a separate kernel compiler and userland
compiler (e.g. on sparc64). This test will barf on gcc-2.96 up to -67 and
on 2.97 until end of November or so).
Similarly a testcase for the reload bug which caused in 2.95.2
miscompilation of some long long stuff in the kernel could be added as well
if you want to go that way.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.137 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site