[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CPU capabilities -- an update proposal
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I wonder (you or hpa may very quickly point out why this is stupid
> and impossible), could we move the identify_cpu() calls into
> cpu_init()? I used to think it was called too early for that, but
> now I see it's already using current, smp_processor_id(), printk().

I like that idea. I think it would clean up a lot of crud.


<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.107 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site