[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels
>>>>> "Frédéric" == Frédéric L W Meunier <> writes:

Frédéric> Keith Owens wrote:
>> Rule 2. Any glibc that has a symlink from
>> /usr/include/{linux,asm} to /usr/src/linux/include/{linux,asm}
>> is wrong.

Frédéric> Such symlinks are created by the user.

>> Relying on /usr/include/{linux,asm} always pointing at the
>> current kernel source is broken as designed.

Frédéric> From glibc 2.2.1 FAQ:

Frédéric> 2.17. I have /usr/include/net and /usr/include/scsi as
Frédéric> symlinks into my Linux source tree. Is that wrong?

Frédéric> {PB} This was necessary for libc5, but is not correct
Frédéric> when using glibc. Including the kernel header files
Frédéric> directly in user programs usually does not work (see
Frédéric> question 3.5). glibc provides its own <net/*> and
Frédéric> <scsi/*> header files to replace them, and you may have
Frédéric> to remove any symlink that you have in place before you
Frédéric> install glibc. However, /usr/include/asm and
Frédéric> /usr/include/linux should remain as they were.

Frédéric> Keith, are you saying that glibc is wrong?

You both seem to be saying the same thing: that symlinks for
/usr/include/{linux,asm} are wrong.

Why try to argue when you agree?

(Debian does this right; last I heard Red-Hat didn't)
Brian May <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.080 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site