[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: block ioctl to read/write last sector

It looks like the numbers we picked for our respective IOCTLs conflict.
I think I can change mine to the next higher since your patch seems to
have been around longer. What is the general way to deal with these


On 13 Feb 2001, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> >>>>> "Andries" == Andries Brouwer <> writes:
> Andries> Anyway, an ioctl just to read the last sector is too silly.
> Andries> An ioctl to change the blocksize is more reasonable.
> I actually sent you a patch implementing this some time ago, remember?
> We need it for XFS...
> Patch against 2.4.2-pre3 follows.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.067 / U:2.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site