[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: eepro100.c, kernel 2.4.1

    On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:26:51AM -0800, Ion Badulescu wrote:
    > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:15:39 +0900, Augustin Vidovic <> wrote:
    > >> eth0: Sending a multicast list set command from a timer routine........."
    > >>
    > >> If you find such messages, the work-around really did something. Otherwise,
    > >> it's the placebo effect...
    > >
    > > Now, I do not get _any_ message in the logs, which means that the network
    > > cards activity is closer to normality than before the patch.
    > So your patch did not do you any good. Case closed, as far as the work-around
    > is concerned.

    I've just checked: "Sending a multicast list set command" is printed only on
    high debug levels, so Augustin might not see them.

    If "Receiver lock-up workaround activated" message is printed, then the
    workaround is really activated.
    I doubt that the real reason is that RX bug, but periodic multicast list set
    commands may certainly affect the behavior.

    Augustin, could you send the output of `lspci' and `eepro100-diag -ee', please?
    (The latter may be taken from

    Best regards
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.023 / U:6.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site